.webp)
_gif.gif)
.png)
Introduction
Jason Cichowicz' tenure as Judge of Probate Court in St. Joseph County, Indiana, has been mired in controversy. His unexpected rise to power in 2018, past financial dealings, and subsequent 45 day suspension have raised significant concerns among voters and political watchdogs. This article provides an in-depth examination of the key events that have shaped his career and their implications.
The Path to Judgeship
On November 6, 2018, Jason Cichowicz was narrowly elected as Judge of Probate Court, defeating his opponent by a mere 0.60% margin out of over 90,000 ballots cast. However, the election victory was preceded by a questionable property transfer. Nine months prior, Cichowicz’ father, Kenneth, signed a quitclaim deed transferring a house that is currently valued at $533,300 to him for just $1. This transaction’s timing and significance continue to provoke speculation about its impact on his judicial misconduct.
Financial Gains and Judicial Misconduct
In early 2019, Kenneth Cichowicz was awarded no-bid contracts for government building renovations and vehicle purchases in 2020. These transactions became focal points of concern, especially after Jason Cichowicz was suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court in 2023 for "extremely serious judicial misconduct." In the suspension, Jason Cichowicz agreed he broke several violations, including: Rule 1.3 "abusing the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interests of another" raising ethical questions about his conduct. (see the Supreme Court filings attached at the bottom of the page)
Electoral Finance and Familial Support
Cichowicz launched his 2024 re-election campaign with a $150,100 loan, and later was significantly supported by his parents, who also donated $5,000.
Additionally, his mother, Sharon Cichowicz, contributed $40,000 to the local Democratic Party, which has actively campaigned against Cichowicz’ electoral opponent. These financial maneuvers underline the intertwining of personal and political interests throughout his judicial career.
Continued Scrutiny
In 2021, Judge Cichowicz was named 58 times in a Bank of America lawsuit where Bank of America suspected Cichowicz of "financial elder abuse." The lawsuit states: "On January 7, 2021, BANA declined the transfer because it believed Judge Cichowicz may be financially exploiting Mr. Cartwright." "BANA harbors suspicions about this relationship and the potential for elder abuse." Bank of America called into question other violations: "BANA believed the handwriting on the signature card (other than Mr. Cartwright’s signature) was that of Judge Cichowicz." or "Mr. Cartwright gifted Judge Cichowicz about $30,000 in stock from the Cartwright Trust. Though Mr. Cartwright signed the letter directing this stock gift, the return address on the letter was Judge Cichowicz’ home address, according to BANA."
Bridge Link
Beyond financial controversies, Cichowicz’ Bridge Link Program faced criticism following its association with two fatalities, exacerbating concerns about his judicial decisions’ broader social impacts. Cichowicz continues to double down on this program and even campaigns on the success of the program despite the loss of life.
Implications for Voters
These developments underscore the need for informed decision-making among voters. Cichowicz’ actions exemplify the complex interplay between personal gain and public service, highlighting the importance of transparency and accountability in judicial roles.
Conclusion
Jason Cichowicz’ financial entanglements and ethical breaches serve as cautionary tales for voters and officials alike. As Cichowicz seeks re-election, his narrative provides critical insights into the necessity for integrity in public office, urging constituents to exercise informed judgment.
Jason Cichowicz' CFA-4
CSJC Democrats Financials (You should find Sharon Cichowicz on page 65 and page 90)
Bank of America Lawsuit
Supreme Court Documents
