.webp)
.png)
South Bend taxpayers are unknowingly funding a $60,000-per-year consulting contract for Gladys Muhammad, the Secretary of the Democratic Party. Records confirm that Muhammad, who is 80 years old now, has been earning this sum each year, since at least 2022 through an arrangement that has now raised questions about transparency and the proper use of taxpayer funds.
Details of the Contract
According to official documents, Muhammad was appointed by South Bend's Democratic Mayor James Mueller to provide consulting services to the City of South Bend. Her responsibilities include community engagement regarding housing development, facilitating public sessions, and supporting initiatives like the AARP Age-Friendly Community program. She is paid $5,000 monthly for only 80 hours of work, making her annual earnings under the contract total $60,000.
While the tasks outlined in the contract are relevant to community development, they raise questions about the Democratic Mayor awarding this taxpayer-funded agreement to the Democratic Party Secretary and having no public input or discussion about who may be the best applicant for the position.
The Issue at Hand
Critics argue that the arrangement blurs ethical boundaries. Muhammad's dual role as a political figure and a government-backed consultant has prompted concerns that public funds may be subsidizing a politically affiliated individual rather than strictly benefiting residents.
“Are South Bend taxpayers financing meaningful community development, or are they unknowingly funding a Democratic Party representative?” one critic asked when the details surfaced. This sentiment echoes growing frustrations from transparency advocates who question why this contract was not subject to greater public scrutiny.
Further, the contract does not explicitly clarify how deliverables, such as public outreach efforts, are measured for effectiveness or whether the contractor has indeed met the 80-hour monthly threshold. The lack of concrete accountability mechanisms strengthens suspicions that public funds may not be entirely insulated from partisan interests.
Was Transparency a Priority?
Muhammad's contract has been renewed annually without broader public discussion. Another local resident called for greater oversight on consulting agreements of this nature, demanding a more thorough vetting process to ensure taxpayers’ money is used effectively. “Transparency shouldn't be an afterthought—it should be the foundation of all public contracts,” one South Bend resident told Redress South Bend.
Public Implications
The arrangement brings to light broader concerns about the intersection of politics and public service. Should officials who hold elected roles in political parties be eligible for government/taxpayer funded contracts? Could such a practice set a dangerous precedent for misusing public funds to benefit political campaigns or political parties indirectly?
Although Gladys Muhammad’s responsibilities as a consultant may tangentially advance the city’s community engagement goals, the lack of public awareness and oversight raises red flags regarding the ethical and financial integrity of this arrangement.
Last Thought
For taxpayers, here is the question we need answered—did South Bend Mayor James Mueller hire a consultant for legitimate community development, or did he make South Bend residents foot the bill for the St Joseph County Democratic Party?
GM 2024 Contract
GM 2023 Contract
GM 2022 Contract